Yesterday was devoted to lies about Hillary Clinton’s obvious ill health (and her team’s blatant lying about it). Today is all about Clinton’s corruption.
You mean you’d pick on a sick old woman?
In this case: absolutely!
“Clinton Foundation Is Charity Fraud Of Epic Proportions.”
When Ortel tried to match up the Clinton Foundation’s tax filings with the disclosure reports from its major donors, he said he started to find problems. That includes records from the foundation’s many offshoots—including the Clinton Health Access Initiative and the Clinton Global Initiative—as well as its foreign subsidiaries.
“I decided it would be fun to cross-check what their donors thought they did when they donated to the Clinton Foundation, and that’s when I got really irritated,” he said. “There are massive discrepancies between what some of the major donors say they gave to the Clinton Foundation to do, and what the Clinton Foundation said what they got from the donors and what they did with it.”
As previously reported, last year the Clinton Foundation was forced to issue corrected tax filings for several years to correct donation errors. But Ortel said many of the discrepancies remain. “I’m against charity fraud. I think people in both parties are against charity fraud, and this is a charity fraud,” he said.
To be sure, Ortel’s efforts were to be commended: digging through the foundation’s numbers can not have been easy, considering that the nation’s most influential charity watchdog put the Clinton Foundation on its “watch list” of problematic nonprofits in 2015. Furthermore, the Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid. That’s because the organization spent the vast bulk of its windfall on “administration, travel, salaries and bonuses”, with the fattest payouts going to family friends.
More: “An educated guess, based upon ongoing analysis of the public record begun in February 2015, is that the Clinton Foundation entities are part of a network that has defrauded donors and created illegal private gains of approximately $100 billion in combined magnitude, and possibly more, since 23 October 1997.”
How did Clinton toady Sydney Blumenthal get his hands on top secret NSA reports less than 24 hours after they were presented? (Hat tip: Director Blue.)
Hillary’s lackeys went on an email deletion spree after the subpoenas were issued.
Trump: “People who have nothing to hide don’t smash phones.” (Hat tip: Director Blue)
“Clinton Foundation officials repeatedly skirted or ignored federal laws and regulations while converting the non-profit from its tax-exempt purpose of building a presidential library in Little Rock, Arkansas, into a $2 billion global machine selling political influence and access on an unprecedented scale, according to documents reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation.”
“FBI managers instructed to exonerate Hillary Clinton.”
If you want to restore the rule of law, you need to vote for Trump.
“‘Crooked Hillary’ nickname isn’t going away.”
”A Hillary Clinton presidency is Russian Roulette with a semi-auto. With Trump, at least you can spin the cylinder and take your chances.”
Matt Lauer criticized for not being sufficiently deferential to Queen Hillary.
“A media organization demanding that other media organizations stop reporting on an obviously newsworthy story, exactly because it’s hurting the liberal Democratic criminal they favor.”
Obama’s Justice Department seems to be keen on giving Clinton’s IT people immunity…and then doing nothing with the information.
Random Slashdot comment on how in-the-tank for Hillary (and hypocrisy) “Public Citizen” is: “That’s right: a 501(c)(4) corporation made a movie with the express political purpose of protesting the Supreme Court decision that a 501(c)(4) corporation could make a movie with an express political purpose!”
A pre-collapse Hillary, enjoying smaller than expected crowds, walls off portion of room to give illusion of fullness.
What happens if Hillary drops out? However, I don’t think the DNC would actually try to foist Chelsea off on us as the Democratic candidate, for a host reasons too extensive to explicate here.
More on the same theme. Also, hats off to the New York Post graphics department for this:
(Hat tip: Instapundit.)
“The media elites are in a panic. They witnessed the meltdown of their candidate in broad daylight and can feel that shiver up their spine — except that this time, it is not the delight of victory they are feeling, but the dread of defeat.”
And as a bonus, here are a few more links about Hillary’s obvious ill-health:
“The most charitable reading of this timeline is that her campaign — presumably with the blessing and perhaps insistence of the candidate — fully intended to keep her illness a secret from the public. Let’s be clear about what this means: Her campaign intended to lie.” (Hat tip: Director Blue.)
They even avoided the ER just to conceal her medical treatment from the public.
Today’s spin on the why of the lie: It’s all her staff’s fault.
Clinton News Network is gonna Clinton News Network. (Hat tip: Ed Driscoll at Instapundit.)
Longtime Huffington Post writer fired for questioning Hillary’s health vindicated. “It turns out Dr. Drew and I lost our media perches for simply sharing incontrovertible truth, which I knew at the time: Hillary Clinton’s health is not just bad. It’s not just allergies. Hillary Clinton’s health is horrific.” (Hat tip: Director Blue.)
Tags: 2016 Election, 2016 Presidential Race, Chelsea Clinton, Clinton Foundation, CNN, Crime, Democrats, Elections, Hillary Clinton, Hillary Clinton Health, Hillary Clinton Scandals, Huffington Post, Media Watch, New York Post, Public Citizen
This entry was posted on Tuesday, September 13th, 2016 at 8:44 AM and is filed under Crime, Democrats, Elections, Media Watch. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.