Reason brings us word that victimhood identity politics efforts to redefine campus sexual assault have now reached some perfect Bizarro World conclusion: It’s now “sexual violence” to withhold sex.
From the UM official page:
Sexual violence
Examples of sexual violence include: discounting the partner’s feelings regarding sex; criticizing the partner sexually; touching the partner sexually in inappropriate and uncomfortable ways; withholding sex and affection; always demanding sex; forcing partner to strip as a form of humiliation (maybe in front of children), to witness sexual acts, to participate in uncomfortable sex or sex after an episode of violence, to have sex with other people; and using objects and/or weapons to hurt during sex or threats to back up demands for sex.
If withholding sex is now “sexual violence,” just think of the lawsuit possibilities! Under this definition, I could sue just about every woman in America!
Finally, feminism has succeeded twisting logic so far that just about the entire population is guilty of “domestic violence.”
Except those who have never been asked for sex. Hmm, who might that be?
Tags: feminism, University of Michigan
That’s funny, I thought marital sex was rape, but withholding sex is a crime? Make up your damn minds.