It’s easy to get discouraged over the obscene metastasis of creeping social justice infecting our institutions. Even though only something like 15% of Americans back radical leftwing social justice, it often gives the impression of moving from victory to victory.
But it’s important to note that forces of American liberty have won important victories against the woke Borg. Indeed, the good guys have recently taken scalps in the realm of higher education, and those victories are worth noting.
Item one: VMI alumni managed to get that school’s diversity chief to quit.
proactive alumni group working to curb diversity, equity and inclusion at the Virginia Military Institute has been given credit for prompting the school’s DEI chief to quit.
An article in The Washington Post largely cites the actions of proactive alumni, most notably members of “The Spirit of VMI” group, for the decision by Jamica Love to leave her post.
“Love, 49, who leaves her position at the end of June, was the highest-ranking Black woman at the nation’s oldest state-supported military college. But she faced intense backlash from some alumni and cadets as soon as her hiring was announced in May 2021,” the Post reported June 1.
While the Post’s article suggested the dislike of DEI at VMI is due to disgruntled white male alumni, former students there have told The College Fix in recent years they seek to preserve honor and meritocracy at the institute in the face of equity programming. They also said they reject the argument the institute is steeped in racism and sexism.
As The College Fix previously reported, the controversy dates back to a 2021 consultants report that accused VMI of “institutional racism and sexism” and recommended the implementation of new DEI measures.
Last year alumni began actively writing to state lawmakers about their concerns, including Gov. Glenn Younking, as well as voice complaints on social media.
Earlier this year, alumni said they will withhold donations as VMI implements DEI programming.
(Hat tip: Instapundit.)
Item the second: Texas A&M rescinded a journalism professor’s tenure offer after public outcry, causing A&M’s president to resign.
Texas A&M University has been at the focus of a media firestorm this past month after the school walked back the terms of a job offer extended to journalism professor Dr. Kathleen McElroy.
The saga began with the publication of a story by Valerie Munoz, a Texas A&M journalism student, in Texas Scorecard that highlighted the school’s recent decision to hire McElroy as the new department head overseeing the school of journalism. The university offered McElroy tenured status similar to her present faculty position at the University of Texas.
The story pointed to McElroy’s advocacy for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) measures in both academic settings and newsrooms, drawing a contrast between the journalism professor’s approach to education and new state public policy measures passed by the Texas Legislature this year banning DEI offices in public universities.
In addition, the story reported on a statement by McElroy on her approach to journalism, that she opposes the equal representation of all sides of an issue in news reporting if one side is deemed “illegitimate.”
After the story broke, the university began walking back elements of the job offer, causing McElroy to decide to take the details public.
In an interview with the Texas Tribune, McElroy, who is black, stated she felt she was being “judged by race” and maybe gender after the school decided to rescind the tenure offer and instead offer a one-year contract and at-will employment terms. She said she didn’t believe other people would face the same bars or challenges and that she felt “damaged” by the entire process.
The story has since snowballed into national headlines, and outrage over the hiring process has resulted in the resignation of both the university’s interim dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Jose Luis Bermudez and President Katherine Banks.
If Bermudez and Banks are backers of social justice, and it very much appears they were, their departures (and scalps) are also welcome.
The Texas A&M Faculty Senate recently voted to create a fact-finding committee to investigate the circumstances surrounding the alteration of the job offer extended to McElroy. Shortly after that, Banks tendered her resignation to Chancellor John Sharp, writing that the mass negative press on the incident led to the decision.
“The recent challenges regarding Dr. McElroy have made it clear to me that I must retire immediately. The negative press is a distraction from the wonderful work being done here,” Banks wrote.
Numerous reports placed blame on “outside groups” improperly influencing hiring decisions at the school, a claim reportedly started by the faculty senate. That turned attention to one organization of former Aggies in particular, The Rudder Association (TRA).
According to its website, TRA is “a group of dedicated Aggies committed to preserving and perpetuating the core values and unique spirit” of the university.
In a series of press statements on the group’s website, TRA pushed back on reports characterizing its members, which includes taxpayers, tuition payers, and donors to the school, as “outside influence.” In addition, the group said that university regents and elected officials should not be characterized as such either.
Firing by firing, progress is made.
The bad news, of course, is that McElroy is still at UT…
Tags: Critical Race Theory, Democrats, Jamica Love, John Sharp, Jose Luis Bermudez, Katherine Banks, Kathleen McElroy, Social Justice Warriors, Texas, Texas A&M, The Rudder Association, University of Texas, Valerie Munoz, Virginia, VMI
Unfortunately, there are plenty more that are perfectly willing to step up to the plate and do the same jobs…
I don’t think it’s recoverable, TBH. What’s going to have to happen is that the entire system is going to have to be routed around, because it has rendered itself irrelevant, and worst of all, just plain silly.
We’re at the early stages of it. People are already questioning the value of the college diploma, given the way they’ve just handed them out like prizes in a Cracker Jack box. It won’t be too long until some alternative form of external skill record/assessment comes to the fore, likely something like an ISO program covering basic skills for individuals. The real problem we have isn’t that the schools have been taken over by leftist ideologues, but that the value of what they provided has been so thoroughly degraded. When my grandmother got her high school diploma back around 1916, she had a transcript including Greek, Latin, the higher elements of calculus, and a whole host of other things that you’d be termed an abuser for trying to teach to today’s high school students. Her diploma meant something… The one they gave me, by comparison, basically carried the implication that I managed to get to school on time for four years, and that was about all anyone looked at it for. The value of the education received was ridiculously inferior, especially considering all the damn time I was forced to sacrifice to it.
That’s the real crisis. And, it ain’t just the leftists that did this to us, either…
Insty talks about this a lot: what will cause the whole education scam to fail ultimately will be the losing value proposition. Why should I foot $320,000 (Rice, w/o “aid”) or $128K/248K (A&M) if the job prospects are minimal? The demand for credentials is not unlimited.
the questions are when will it collapse and what will be left afterwards?