This is an interesting video on the conflict between some poor boatniks known as “Anchor-Outs” for anchoring in Richardson Bay, just off Sausalito, California, and a government entity known as the “Richardson Bay Regional Agency.”
What’s the conflict? RBRA wants them gone, because they pay neither rent nor taxes, and their ramshackle boat view spoil the views of limousine liberals.
So they just seize and destroy people’s boats.
Some quotes:
“The RBRA. It’s the Richardson Bay Regional Agency. I call it the ‘Rich Boy Reach Around’.”
“They want to get rid of us all and gentrify the whole waterfront, eliminate the historical waterfront atmosphere, and put mooring balls for yachts.
They just want millionaire yachts.”
“Richardson Bay is in one of the wealthiest counties in the U.S. and is a scenic vista for million dollar homes. Basically, this is the most desirable place to live in all California. And ironically, it’s run by limousine liberals, you know? Rich people don’t want to look at poor people. A lot of them are people that were born here that have been out here a long time, and they just kind of got priced out.”
“There aren’t many housing options for someone on a fixed income of $1,200 a month.” Funny how Democratic Party-run locales always seem to price the poor out of the market.
“For the past few years the RBRA has taken the extreme step of confiscating and crushing boats in their effort to clear out the anchorage. Leaving many boat owners homeless. ‘It’s to push out the poor. They want to get rid of the junkier boats. They literally would like to get rid of all the boats.'”
A detailed discussion of various local ordinances follows, some of which appear to be at odds with national maritime law.
“This is a federal anchorage so they don’t have authority to actually come out here and police us. People telling you laws, regulations, 72 hour anchoring, harbormaster. All that is just lies. It’s smoke and mirrors.”
Are there parallels between the Anchor-Outs and the homeless plaguing Austin? A few. But there doesn’t appear to be a large crime problem, the people in the boats don’t appear to be dealing drugs, and if they’re on boats, they’re not panhandling or breaking into people’s houses, so the parallels to Adlers seem minimal. Also, if they haul their own garbage (as the video states), they’re not leaving the needles on public streets (or floating in the bay), so there also seems to be little parallel with Seattle’s dystopian RV drug culture.
Sausalito’s limousine liberals do truly seem to have become The Man, using their power to oppress the little guy.
This entry was posted on Thursday, January 5th, 2023 at 6:11 PM and is filed under Democrats, Regulation, video. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
5 Responses to “Limousine Liberals vs. Poor Boatniks”
[…] and Over 1,500 unaccompanied Cuban minors crossed into U.S. through Mexico in 2022 BattleSwarm: Limousine Liberals vs. Poor Boatniks Behind The Black: Updates on India’s space effort, Voyager signs deal with Airbus to build its […]
I remember the Town Lake floating encampment in 1988ish. How did the City of Austin get rid of them?
[…] and Over 1,500 unaccompanied Cuban minors crossed into U.S. through Mexico in 2022 BattleSwarm: Limousine Liberals vs. Poor Boatniks Behind The Black: Updates on India’s space effort, Voyager signs deal with Airbus to build its […]
I don’t know why anyone is surprised by this sort of thing. It’s what the oligarchs do, regardless of which party they’re masquerading as.
[…] This story is the flip side of state bureaucrats seizing the boats of poor people just because they’re offend limousine liberal e…. […]
[…] This story is the flip side of state bureaucrats seizing the boats of poor people just because they’re offend limousine liberal e…. […]