I usually catalog these over on my other blog, but given the subject matter I’ll do the initial cataloging here. Both are books I’m interested in the subject matter, but I was also interested in picking up both to fight efforts to “deplatform” the respective authors.
Library Additions: Two Books Related to Islam
September 29th, 2018LinkSwarm for September 28, 2018
September 28th, 2018We have survived Kavanaugh Week and made it to fall. On to the LinkSwarm:
I don't think I've lived through a time where the intensity of the mainstream media's conception of itself — as a non-partisan arbiter of truth — has been more at odds with the reality
— Jamie Kirchick (@jkirchick) September 26, 2018
Democratic representative Alcee Hastings (Fla.) has officially brought a convicted money launderer onto his full-time staff after paying the individual for “part-time” work over the past several years.
Dona Nichols Jones, who has received compensation from Hastings since April 2014 for what was listed as “part-time” employment as an aide and community liaison out of his Palm Beach County office, is now listed as a “staff assistant” in his office, Legistorm filingsshow.
Dona Nichols Jones is married to Mikel Jones, who worked for Rep. Hastings from 1993 to 2011 as a district administrator. The couple was convicted of money laundering, conspiracy, and fraud in 2011 after they had used hundreds of thousands of dollars from a business loan for personal use.
Online voting is a persistently bad idea, one that is only liked by people who are completely ignorant of the security issues, and yet one that seemingly will not go away. If you are suspicious that Stalin’s dictum of it’s not who cast the vote that matters, what’s important is who counts the vote is in play here, you’re not the only one.
(Hat tip: Amy Alkon on Twitter.)
Kavanaugh Smear Twitter Roundup
September 27th, 2018The idea of writing yet another article on why the Kavanaugh smears are transparent garbage is mind-numbing, so here’s a tweet roundup to accomplish the same thing:
3) She NEVER alerts any adults or authorities and certainly not THE POLICE that these gang rapes are occurring?
4) She keeps going to the parties until SHE HERSELF is given a spiked drink & is raped by multiple boys while Kavanaugh watches?
— STEALTH JEFF (@drawandstrike) September 26, 2018
7) She's silent as Brett Kavanaugh goes through SIX background checks & confirmation hearings until he's nominated to the Supreme Court & his very public, nationally visible confirmation hearing is over & 3 weeks of sex assault accusations, now she comes forward with this story?
— STEALTH JEFF (@drawandstrike) September 26, 2018
Like Ramirez, this 'witness' isn't going to provide any real info to the Senate staff.
They will want the names of which other girls were raped.
They will want the names of which particular boys did the raping.
They will want the year, location and time of these assaults.— STEALTH JEFF (@drawandstrike) September 26, 2018
But it's going to be fun watching The Creepy Porn Lawyer™ send out more emails and screech about how he's being ignored in the next 48 hours.
/end
— STEALTH JEFF (@drawandstrike) September 26, 2018
"Hey, Brett and the guys are holding their 10th gang rape party of the summer. I definitely need to go." — not an actual thought process that would enter into any actual woman's head
— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) September 26, 2018
Julie Swetnick: "Oh, yeah. I totally saw them lined up to gang rape a girl at a few parties."
Normal Person: "Wait. FEW?? You kept going to them?"
Julie Swetnick: "TOTALLY! I was even the girl being raped once!"Guys, this is bullshit.
— RBe (@RBPundit) September 26, 2018
Two women talking in 1981:
“What are you doing this weekend?”
“Going to another gang rape party, wanna come?”
“Hell yes! Those are the best parties, what with all the gang rape and no one ever saying anything.”
“Bring your own quasludes.”
“Way ahead of you.” #Bullshit— Derek Hunter (@derekahunter) September 26, 2018
So to summarize claims:
Swetnick graduated High School in 1980.
In 1982, as a college student, she was attending high-school parties where druggings & gang rapes occurred with regularity.
She went back to those parties 10 times.
She is just now reporting this, 37 years later.
Ok— Benny (@bennyjohnson) September 26, 2018
Kavanaugh drinking = evidence of sexual assault.
BK not calling himself a drunk = evidence of sexual assault.
BK saying he was a virgin = evidence of sexual assault.
BK being a conservative = evidence of sexual assault.
Only thing missing? Actual evidence of sexual assault.
— (((AG))) (@AG_Conservative) September 26, 2018
Kavanaugh: I didn’t sexually assault anyone.
Dems: LIAR! WE DONT BELEIVE YOU AND WE WILL NEVER BELIEVE YOU.
Beto: I didn’t flee the scene of my DUI accident.
Dems: Hey, it’s cool man, we believe you. No worries.
— Matt’s Idea Shop (@MattsIdeaShop) September 25, 2018
#DearCreepyPornLawyer, I have Strictly Confidential and Urgent Business Proposal regarding Brett Kavanaugh's drunken teenage sex tour in my homeland of NIGERIA. I shall be grateful if you could receive this information.
— Libertorium (@libertorium) September 25, 2018
— STEALTH JEFF (@drawandstrike) September 26, 2018
— The Gormogons (@Gormogons) September 25, 2018
— Matthew Bracken❌ (@Matt_Bracken on GAB.ai) (@MattBracken48) September 26, 2018
A Smear Too Far
September 26th, 2018There is a growing sense that the Democratic Media Smear Machine Complex has finally overreached with the latest unsubstantiated smear against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. Far from demoralizing Republicans our getting Kavanaugh to withdraw, instead it’s stiffened senate spines and galvanized Republican voters heading into midterms.
Describing earlier calls with other conservative leaders, [Family Research Council president Tony] Perkins said there is growing dissatisfaction with the manner in which the GOP has treated the accusations, while cautioning that in his own view McConnell and Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Chuck Grassley have handled the situation as best they could.
“There’s a sense that the Republicans have bent over backwards to accommodate only to be kicked in the process,” he told TheDCNF.
Elsewhere in the interview, Perkins warned that Republican lawmakers would pay an electoral price in the November election should Kavanaugh’s nomination fail. (RELATED: Kavanaugh Addresses His Encounter With Parkland Dad In Written Supplement To Testimony)
“Conservatives want the Republicans to fight for this,” he said. “This is what the election in 2016 was about and that’s what I believe the midterm election will be about as well.”
Carrie Severino, chief counsel of the Judicial Crisis Network, detected similar enthusiasm in her own conversations with conservative groups and Kavanaugh allies following the appearance of the Ramirez allegations.
“Conservatives have been galvanized by the coordinated smears of the Democrats and especially outraged at the publication of discredited allegations.”
Not only has it galvanized conservatives in general, but some who were resolutely #NeverTrump in 2016 are now falling in line:
The last-minute ambush validates key assumptions of Trump’s supporters that fueled his rise and buttress him in office, no matter how rocky the ride has been or will become. At least three key premises have been underlined by tawdry events of the last couple of weeks.
First, that good character is no defense. If you are John McCain, who genuinely tried to do the right thing and carefully cultivated a relationship with the media over decades, they will still call you a racist when you run against Barack Obama.
If you are Mitt Romney, an exceptionally earnest and decent man, they will make you into a heartless and despicable vulture capitalist, also for the offense of campaigning against Obama.
If you are Brett Kavanaugh, a respected member of the legal establishment who doesn’t have a flyspeck on his record across decades of public service in Washington, they will come up with dubious accusations of wrongdoing from decades ago when you were a teenager.
Second, that the media is an unremitting political and cultural adversary. In the Kavanaugh controversy, the press has been wholly on the other side, presuming his guilt and valorizing his accusers and their supporters, including Hawaii Sen. Mazie Hirono, whose most famous contribution to the debate was telling men to “shut up.” The advocacy isn’t limited to cable networks or the Twitter feeds of journalists. It reaches all the way up the food chain.
The New Yorker, which imagines itself an upholder of the finest standards of American journalism, which sports a refined monocle-wearing dandy as its mascot, which was once edited by that famous paragon of editorial care, William Shawn, happily published a new accusation against Kavanaugh even though the accuser herself had doubts about it (she only became convinced of it after days of consideration and talks with her lawyer).
The New York Times passed on the story when it couldn’t find any first-hand corroboration of it. The New Yorker didn’t allow that to become an obstacle.
Third, that politics isn’t just rough-and-tumble; it’s red in tooth and claw. Process and norms are nice, but they go out the window as soon as something important is at stake, like a potential fifth vote on the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Senate Democrats may delicately talk about the importance of norms and civility on Sunday shows, but watch how they act. They sat on an accusation throughout an extensive process of vetting and questioning a nominee, then declared it dispositive evidence against his confirmation when it leaked at the 11th hour. They delayed a hearing with Christine Blasey Ford long enough to allow time for the second accuser to be persuaded to come forward.
All of this plays into Trump’s support. Surely, a reason that the president appealed to many Republicans in the first place, despite his extravagant personal failings, was that they had decided that virtuous men would get smeared and chewed up by the opposition’s meat grinder, so why be a stickler for standards?
Widespread disgust over the sheer nastiness of Democratic tactics may be (along with a booming economy) why Republicans have passed Democrats in generic favorability polls, the GOP’s highest ratings since 2010, a year that was not notably kind to Democrats at the ballot box.
Republican lawmakers have a stark choice: confirm Kavanaugh or get slaughtered out in November:
The rubber is about to meet the road for Senate Republicans. They have a simple choice: they can vote to confirm Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, thereby ending the baseless and unsubstantiated Democrat- and media-fueled smear campaign against him, or they can kiss House and Senate majorities goodbye for the next decade, if not longer.
In case the election of one Donald J. Trump was not enough to compel the D.C. Republican establishment swamp creatures to wipe the muck from their eyes and see what’s happening with their own constituents, Republican voters have had enough of feckless do-nothings whose careers consist of little more than not doing everything they promised to do.
Give us the House, the Senate, and the White House, they said, and we’ll repeal Obamacare. Give us power across the major elected branches, and we’ll secure the border, they promised. With a Republican president in the White House and a Republican majority in the Senate, we’ll confirm the most conservative Supreme Court nominees you can imagine, they claimed.
Snip.
Republican lawmakers have to understand that their voters have zero patience for their excuses for not doing what they promised. It’s why they elected Trump in the first place. Republican senators failed to repeal Obamacare after promising to do so for years. That was strike one. They’ve steadfastly refused to secure the border, let alone build a barrier along the most porous sections of the nation’s border with Mexico. That was strike two.
A refusal to vote to confirm Kavanaugh in the face of a blatantly obvious Democrat smear campaign, orchestrated in concert with a compliant and obscenely partisan national media, will be strike three, and there will be no more at-bats. I have spent a career working in and covering politics, and I have never witnessed the kind of anger among rank-and-file GOP voters generated from a combination of the unsubstantiated Democrat attacks on Kavanaugh and the flaccid response of emasculated Republicans.
Snip.
If Kavanaugh is not safe from reputation- and career-destroying smears, no one is. Not you. Not your husband. Not your son, father, or brother. If they can destroy Kavanaugh, they can do it to anyone you love and trust, regardless of any mountains of facts or evidence to the contrary.
Snip.
if GOP lawmakers show that they do have a spine and are no longer willing to let the other side get away with reputation murder, they might actually keep both their House and Senate majorities in November. As Trump has shown, even discouraged Republican voters are willing to stand behind somebody who’s willing to stand up for them.
Even the famously calm/embalmed majority leader Mitch McConnell was showing signs of irritation at the sheer dishonest on display from Democrats
I have never seen Mitch McConnell this riled up. He is finally feeling the same anger and the same passion that his constituents have been feeling for years. There may yet be hope for the @GOP . They need more reinforcements tho. Vote Red in November.
— Oak-town ☢ Unfiltered [ Activated] (@hrtablaze) September 26, 2018
Early on it looked like McConnell was letting Democrats walk all over him by bending over backwards to accommodate their “witnesses” and ever-changing demands. Now it appears he may just have been playing possum while Democrats reeled out enough rope to hang themselves.
James Woods Refuses To Delete Tweet
September 25th, 2018Here’s a follow-up to Sunday’s story about Twitter locking actor James Woods’ account:
Actor James Woods has been locked out of his Twitter account over a two-month-old tweet that was found to be in violation of the tech company’s rules.
The tweet, posted July 20, included a hoax meme that said it came from Democrats and encouraged men not to vote in the midterm elections.
Woods said he received an email from Twitter on Thursday saying the tweet “has the potential to be misleading in a way that could impact an election.”
The email said Woods can use his account again if he deletes the tweet, but would be suspended from the social media platform permanently if there are repeated abuses.
Woods told The Associated Press Sunday he interpreted the message to mean he’ll be allowed back on Twitter only if he decides to do what Twitter says.
“Free speech is free speech — it’s not Jack Dorsey’s version of free speech,” Woods said, referring to Twitter Chief Executive Jack Dorsey.
“The irony is, Twitter accused me of affecting the political process, when in fact, their banning of me is the truly egregious interference,” Woods said. “Because now, having your voice smothered is much more disturbing than having your vocal chords slit. If you want to kill my free speech, man up and slit my throat with a knife, don’t smother me with a pillow.”
Good for him. Twitter’s ramped up banning conservative to atone for their own “sin” of not preventing Donald Trump from beating Hillary Clinton in 2016.
If Twitter insists on banning a famous actor with 1.7 million followers over an obvious parody meme, they’ll ban anyone for any reason.
Pat Condell on “Brexit Morons”
September 24th, 2018Pat Condell is in fine form over the continued contempt the remain camp displays towards Brexit supporters:
“We understand now very clearly how despised we are by the political class and by the wider progressive intelligentsia who have shown that they really do regard us as a lower order whose opinions shouldn’t count.”
“The privileged minority who behave like a majority, and who feel entitled to steer the whole of society from inside their little progressive bubble as if by divine right. These are the people who have divided us. All the anger and all the bitterness is coming
from them, and it’s being stoked daily in the media by them the people who won’t accept the result and who are now pushing for a second referendum.”
Twitter Suspends Actor James Woods
September 23rd, 2018Being a famous actor with over 1.7 million followers isn’t enough to keep Twitter from suspending your account if you post a satirical meme making fun of Democrats:
Outspoken conservative actor James Woods was suspended from posting to Twitter over a two-month-old satirical meme which very clearly parodies a Democratic advertisement campaign. While the actor’s tweets are still visible, he is unable to post new content.
The offending tweet from July 20, features three millennial-aged men with “nu-male smiles” and text that reads “We’re making a Woman’s Vote Worth more by staying home.” Above it, Woods writes “Pretty scary that there is a distinct possibility this could be real. Not likely, but in this day and age of absolute liberal insanity, it is at least possible.”
According to screenshots provided by an associate of Woods’, Twitter directed the actor to delete the post on the grounds that it contained “text and imagery that has the potential to be misleading in a way that could impact an election.”
In other words, James Woods, who has approximately 1.72 million followers, was suspended because liberals who don’t identify as women might actually take the meme seriously and not vote.
In a statement released through associate Sara Miller, Woods said “You are a coward, @Jack,” referring to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. “There is no free speech for Conservatives on @Twitter.”
The meme in question:
Not only is Twitter’s staff desperate to protect Democrats during the midterms, they must actually believe in their heart of hearts that male feminists are complete idiots.
Some tweets:
From Mr. woods himself. With his permission I asked him if I could share with you all as I know how much you all adore him. #FreeJamesWoods @RealJamesWoods @Twitter pic.twitter.com/WxtpDESWKq
— Kaya Jones (@KayaJones) September 23, 2018
‘
I note that Twitter will suspend a conservative in a heartbeat, but allow all kinds of hate and threats by liberals to stand for days until shamed into acting. Nothing Mr. Woods did warranted this suspension. Free @RealJamesWoods#FreeJamesWoods
— Joe Lewallen 🇺🇸 (@jokerbc67) September 21, 2018
@Jack IS a coward. He's also a LIAR who told Congress there was no conservative bias. But so far, all I see is twitter taking out vocal conservatives like @RealJamesWoods #freejameswoods https://t.co/rGt3YFapmF
— jgderuvo (@jgderuvo) September 21, 2018
Who’s next to be suspended for tTweeting While Conservative?
CNN Asks Five Republican Women If They Believe Kavanaugh; All Five Say Yes
September 22nd, 2018Here’s another case where CNN asked a focus group a question and didn’t expect the response they got…
We Have A New Winner In “Most Ludicrous Sample Bias In A Texas Senate Race Poll!”
September 20th, 2018After months of “Beto O’Rourke is within striking distance of Ted Cruz!” polls with biased samples, the media polling complex have finally been able to manufacture a “Beto O’Rourke is leading Ted Cruz!” headline.
And they only had to take oversampling Democrats to ludicrous extremes to do so.
Their poll sample had 47% Democrats vs. 43% Republicans among likely voters. (You can find it in question six, after you’ve cranked magnification up to 400% or so.) That’s a pretty accurate breakdown…for 1990. However, here in the real world of 2018, that oversamples Democrats by 16 to 20 points. That’s also why the same poll only has Texas Governor Greg Abbott up by only 9 points over the invisible Lupe Valdez campaign when he walloped Wendy Davis by 20 points in 2014.
“Ipsos online poll released Wednesday in conjunction with Reuters and the University of Virginia.” Note the “online poll” part. As inaccurate as telephone landline polling is, online polling is worse.
This isn’t a poll that should be taken with several grains of salt, it’s a poll that shouldn’t taken seriously at all.