The election is bearing down like a freight train, and early voting just started in Texas. So let’s look at this year’s bond and RRISD board elections.
Here’s what the bonds are ostensibly for.
In August, the school board voted 5-2 to place a $998 million bond proposal on the November ballot. With interest, the bonds would cost local property taxpayers $1.5 billion—55 percent more than voters will see on the ballot.
The proposal is divided into four separate propositions:
Proposition A seeks to allot $798 million ($1.2 billion with interest) to update roofs, floors, air conditioning systems, electrical, and plumbing. It also includes money for school paint jobs and the purchase of new buses.
The proposition would further dedicate resources to constructing a Career and Technical Education facility to expand classes like automotive shop, cosmetology, and dental assistance.
Proposition B contains an estimated $125 million ($160 million with interest) to update instructional technology and infrastructure to shore up the reliability and security of the district’s network.
Proposition C includes $8.6 million ($13.7 million with interest) for the district’s fine arts programs.
Proposition D would provide $65.9 million ($104 million with interest) to update the locker rooms, lighting, and scoreboards of existing athletic facilities and add artificial turf to competition fields.
Seems like a lot of maintenance updates for schools that are relatively new. The parents who have come out against bonds note that the demographics of the district are shrinking, not growing.
In 2018 the district had long term projection done by a company called Templeton Demographics. They projected we would have 24,136 elementary school students this year. The daily attendance reports available on the district website show 20,536 students. The districts enrollment peaked in the 2019-20 school year. The newest projections done by Zondra Education show the potential of a continued decline in enrollment through 2033.
More from Don Zimmerman in Texas Scorecard: “The purpose of the $1.3 billion (including interest) bond tax election is to fund a greedy partisan political machine and its partisan cronies who profit from the obscene taxes and even more obscene sexualization and religious indoctrination of children while their academic achievements decline.”
I recommend voting No on all RRISD bond proposals.
For the board election, the choices are easy: Estevan Jesus “Chuy” Zárate (Place 1), Melissa Ross (Place 2), and Dr. Mingyuan “Michael” Wei (Place 7) are are radical social justice warriors who call their opponents “fascists” for opposing DEI and the transsexual agenda. RRISD voters should vote for:
